First Published: 2009-04-16

What New Strategy for Afghanistan?

Is there an exit strategy from Afghanistan? It may seem encouragingly so coming from the voice of Obama’s smooth rhetoric, but 'the devil is in the details', says Paul Burton.


Middle East Online

With the whirlwind of activity surrounding President Barack Obama’s much vaunted “new” strategy for Afghanistan now over, there is a brief pause for reflection, a chance to look beyond the confident soundbites. For it is difficult not to be swept up by the new president’s charismatic oratory, particularly when backed by the unwavering support of his new friends in Europe.

Remarkably, even Obama’s oft-repeated justification for the ongoing military presence in Afghanistan can seem convincing when delivered in that smooth rhetoric. Why would NATO forces be dying in that harsh outpost of South Asia other than to preserve security on the streets of Paris, London and Berlin? But of course, they’re protecting ordinary citizens from the invidious excesses of militant Islam, whose tentacles would surely be wrapped tightly around our cities were it not for the ongoing battle against the Taliban.

Justification aside, the new strategy will unfurl in a predictable fashion over the coming months. The president’s additional 21,000 forces will roll into the “restive” provinces of southern and eastern Afghanistan. And they will dutifully train the nascent yet improving Afghan National Army.

They might even start to create the semblance of a functioning National Police force, although this is unlikely. According to a US Government Accountability Office report of June 2008, the $6.2bn already spent to this end has not resulted in a single police unit capable of fulfilling its mission.

The troops will probably provide the security required to hold a presidential election on 20 August: Failure to hit this most high profile of benchmarks would surely announce the beginning of the end of NATO’s mission in Afghanistan. Naturally there will be a rising number of “security incidents,” but these will be written off as a necessary cost in the pursuit of bringing an alien brand of democracy to a country to which it is ill suited but which, remarkably, ordinary Afghans have embraced.

But strip away these short-term measures, and the exit strategy remains as elusive as ever. The ultimate measures of success that will facilitate NATO’s withdrawal from Afghanistan are yet to be outlined, and the goalposts continually shifting. Since when was talking to the Taliban a stated aim?

This chimerical mission, started nearly eight years ago with the aim of punishing the perpetrators of 9/11, is further from achieving satisfactory resolution than at any time in its existence.

The morass of contradictory mission statements can be traced back to the original casus belli: Washington and London were seemingly at loggerheads from day one about what the Afghan mission should achieve.

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld spoke blithely about a “light footprint” for Afghanistan, insisting that the goal was not reconstruction but a surgical regime change. His panacea was simplicity itself: force the Taliban out, half-heartedly try to capture al-Qaida leaders, enjoy the eternal gratitude of the Afghan people and move on to Saddam.

The swift military phase would satiate the US viewing public’s apparent desire for revenge after 9/11 while the nefarious Taliban would be swept from power before the world’s media – a perfect symbiosis of cause and effect. And all this would be without a heavy military presence.

The protracted campaign has been hamstrung by this paucity of ambition ever since.

While no one in London disagreed with the tactical need to remove the Taliban, Britain’s strategic goal was far more ambitious. Following his vaunted humanitarian intervention in Kosovo, prime minister Tony Blair and his cohorts viewed Afghanistan as another country that could -- no, must -- benefit from liberal democratic ideals.

The post-Taliban void could be filled with good governance, equal rights for women, a flourishing civil society, rule of law, institutions. After the continual warfare of the previous 25 years, Afghanistan would surely appreciate our goodwill and largesse.

The disregard for history and cultural norms in all of this is staggering. Central governance from a strong capital has never been a feature of Afghanistan. The only functioning level of governance is at local level, where shura councils provide leadership tailored to the realities in their own region. The indigenous tribal law of Pashtunwali will always hold primacy in southern provinces.

And as Churchill discovered in 1897, nothing binds disparate Pashtun tribes like an occupying foreign force (and that is precisely how western forces are viewed by many Afghans).

It is, of course, easy to depict NATO’s military presence in a bad light when robotic, unmanned bombers operated from hangers in the Nevada desert are becoming the Pentagon’s weapon of choice. Any chance these overstretched soldiers have of winning Afghan hearts and minds is shattered by a misplaced payload dropped from 15,000 feet.

And let’s not forget the disastrous effort to rid Afghanistan of opium -- the only source of income for many farming communities. (Perhaps using the crop for medicinal purposes would be a wiser project to sponsor? The International Council on Security and Development (ICOS) recommends a Poppy for Medicine programme, converting part of the opium crop into morphine for use in the under-developed world.) Mercifully, new special envoy Richard Holbrooke has driven a tractor through the current policy, describing it as "the most wasteful and ineffective programme I have seen in 40 years." But, as always in Afghanistan, the devil is in the detail.

At least Obama seems to realise that any durable solution must come from within. With Taliban moderates being courted and Pakistan brought closely into the fold, the grounds for egress from this stark theatre are being laid. But the financial and human cost of this botched conflict will provide a stark legacy: Let us hope lessons will be learned about future neo-imperialist jaunts in faraway lands.

Paul Burton is Director of Policy, International Council on Security and Development (ICOS), London.

Copyright © 2009 Le Monde diplomatique

(Distributed by Agence Global)


US says Iran supplied ballistic missile to Yemen rebels

UN 'appalled' at mass execution of jihadists in Iraq

Palestinians killed in continuing protests over Jerusalem occupation

Over half Syrian refugees in Lebanon live in 'extreme poverty'

Palestinian activist killed in Gaza protests

Foreign fighters a worry as IS struggles to survive

Bourita: Extraordinary meeting between ECOWAS, Morocco to be held beginning of 2018

Saudi-led air strikes, clashes as Yemen forces battle rebels

Sahel force funding shows terrorism fight is Saudi 'priority'

Iraq's Sistani says Hashed should be under government control

Middle-class Egypt adapts as costs soar

Somalia's budget meets IMF terms

Israel PM questioned in graft probe

Lebanon approves bid for oil, gas exploration

US to present 'irrefutable evidence' of Iran violations

Istanbul 'to remove Gulen links' from street names

Iraq hangs 38 jihadists

Pence to visit Middle East despite controversy

Hamas chief calls for continued Jerusalem protests

EU to repatriate 15,000 migrants from Libya in two months

Syria Kurds fear US ally will desert them after IS defeat

Israeli drugmaker Teva to cut 14,000 jobs over two years

Turkey rescues 51 migrants stranded on rocks

Saudi, UAE hold talks with Yemen Islamists

18 killed after bomber strikes Mogadishu police academy

Israeli air strikes target Hamas military facilities

US-led air strikes kill 23 civilians in Syria

Israel union calls nationwide strike over pharmaceutical giant job cuts

UN envoy urges Putin to press Assad for elections

Yemen's Huthi rebels release pro-Saleh media staff

Israel intelligence minister invites Saudi prince to visit

Saudi-led strikes kill 30 in rebel-run Yemen prison

Saudi king says Palestinians have 'right' to Jerusalem

Erdogan urges world to recognise Jerusalem as Palestinian capital

Saudi King says determined to confront corruption

South Sudan needs $1.7 billion humanitarian aid in 2018

UAE oil giant floats 10 percent of retail arm to strong interest

US skeptical about Putin's declaration of military victory in Syria

Growing concern about rise of far-right in Austria

Saudi, UAE seeks to help West Africa fight terrorism

Somali journalist dies after Mogadishu bombing

Israeli sentenced to four years for arson attack on church

Erdogan risks sabotaging fragile relations with Israel

6.2-magnitude earthquake strikes Iran

Two Gazans killed by Israeli ‘strike’, Israel denies claim