First Published: 2017-07-25

Where Afghanistan is heading and what it means for the Arab Gulf
Given their dramatically opposed religious views, the development of Iran-Taliban ties seems unthinkable.
Middle East Online

By Sabahat Khan - DUBAI

Afghan security forces patrol in Nad Ali district of Helmand province in Afghanistan.

Afghanistan is one of the most intense areas of in­ternational instability in the world, affecting the dangerous rivalry be­tween nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan and extending its strategic significance to the Mid­dle East.

The rise of the Islamic State (ISIS) has increased terror levels around the world and redrawn much of the map of the Middle East. However, as its affiliates seek to establish a foothold in Afghanistan, they could imbue the country’s long-standing internal conflict with new and more pressing strategic significance. Consequently, the establishment of ISIS operations in Afghanistan will force a revision of policy positions and priorities inside the country as well as among its various interna­tional stakeholders.

The most credible counter to ISIS expansion within Afghanistan is not the country’s troubled govern­ment but its Sunni insurgent group, the Taliban. Since 2001, the Taliban has proven resilient in the face of overwhelming allied military fire­power and still seems as unlikely as ever to fizzle out of existence. The Taliban has more money, more fighters and more territory now than it has had at any time since the US-led invasion. It is showing no sign of halting its activities.

However, as ISIS emerges it does so at the expense of the Taliban, a group that has declined to ally with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s fabled cali­phate. As the only serious check on ISIS expansion in central Asia, it is the Taliban rather than the embat­tled government of Afghan Presi­dent Ashraf Ghani that many view as a potential ally.

Iran is adapting its approach to Afghanistan. Having recognised the utility of the Taliban as an anti- ISIS bulwark, Iran is developing low levels of engagement with Taliban field commanders. Given their dra­matically opposed religious views, the development of Iran-Taliban ties seems unthinkable. Iran had supported the American toppling of the Taliban as well as the establish­ment of Afghanistan’s post-conflict administration.

However, Tehran has adopted a more pragmatic line. First, by de­veloping ties to the Taliban, the Ira­nians may exert influence over the direction of the Taliban’s attention and add another lever by which to challenge or deter US interests.

Second, a key Iranian priority has been to ensure ISIS does not gain a foothold anywhere near its borders, especially the one it shares with Afghanistan. To that end, coopera­tion with the Taliban is beneficial to both sides.

Third, Tehran has accepted the prospect of the Taliban outliving the diminishing military campaign directed against it. Consequently, it makes sense for Iranians to im­prove ties with the insurgent group and preserve options for the future.

In addition to reaching out to the Taliban, Tehran is supporting the Kabul government, strengthening its influence beyond the Shia Af­ghan communities it supports and limiting its potential political expo­sure in the event of a major change. Consequently, Iran’s evolving posi­tion is moving it closer to the ap­proach of Pakistan, Afghanistan’s most influential external stake­holder.

The last two years have seen Moscow shift its policy in Afghani­stan, especially with regards to the Taliban, fearing ISIS’s international agenda will generate instability from extremists in the Caucasus and Central Asian countries. Beijing is also stepping-up efforts to facili­tate a peace process in Afghanistan as it constructs its Silk Road trade corridors, so Tehran’s moves are not in isolation from key regional stakeholders.

At a time when Riyadh is seeking to include Islamabad in its anti-Iran camp, such growing Iranian con­vergence with Pakistan on Afghan policy is unhelpful to the Saudis, even if it is coincidental. Afghani­stan will remain the most impor­tant strategic issue for Pakistan for some time, especially considering the nature of its intense rivalry with India.

Arab Gulf countries will need to manoeuvre soon if they are to con­tain Iranian influence in Afghani­stan, with the Taliban and Tehran’s growing convergence with Pakistan on Afghan policy. One option for the Arab Gulf might be to establish diplomatic momentum towards supporting a serious peace process between Kabul and the Taliban. This was an option previously, if unsuccessfully, explored by Qa­tar. However, Doha’s role probably needs to shift elsewhere.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, together with Pakistan, were the first countries to recog­nise the Taliban government when it took Kabul in 1996. Though all three later supported the US-led invasion, this does not need to be a fundamental obstacle to progress. With al-Qaeda crippled years ago, providing ISIS a strategic opportu­nity by failing to work out a politi­cal road map for Afghanistan that addresses the Taliban’s future role may be unwise.

Aside from countering Iranian influence, adapting Arab Gulf po­sitions on Afghanistan may prove helpful in allowing the United States to focus more fully on Iran. Crucially also, by helping force a breakthrough in Afghanistan through a national reconciliation effort, the Arab Gulf countries can ensure Afghanistan does not return to the days when al-Qaeda oper­ated out of its territories without restraint.

Sabahat Khan is a senior analyst at the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis (INEGMA).

Copyright ©2017 The Arab Weekly.


Senior Saudi prince blasts Trump's "opportunistic" Jerusalem move

Kuwait ruler’s son named defence minister

Israel PM faces renewed pressure in Europe

Bahraini civil society group criticised after Israel visit

Saudi Arabia lifts decades-long ban on cinemas

EU says Syria war ‘ongoing’ despite Russia pullout

Istanbul nightclub gunman refuses to testify

Integrating Syrians in Turkey carries implications

US opinion views Muslims and Arabs more favourably but political affiliation makes a difference

Iranian conservative protesters say Trump hastening end of Israel

Jordan referred to UN for failing to arrest Sudanese president

Turkey demands life for journalists in coup bid trial

Netanyahu expects EU to follow suit on Jerusalem

Putin orders withdrawal of ‘significant’ amount of troops from Syria

Putin to meet with Sisi in Cairo

GCC at a critical juncture

Houthi rebels tighten grip on Sanaa after Saleh’s assassination

Israel’s Syrian air strikes risk renewing escalation as Iran expands presence in Golan

Qatar to acquire 24 Typhoon fighters from UK

Palestinian stabs Israeli guard in ‘terrorist’ attack

UAE’s Sheikh Mohammed says US Jerusalem decision could help terrorists

Fateh encourages more protests, refuses to meet Pence

Chinese electric carmaker to open Morocco factory

Iraqi victory over IS remains fragile

Morocco’s renewed ties with South Africa likely to consolidate support for Western Sahara stance

Lebanese security forces fire tear gas at protestors

Syria’s justice system: ‘working without a written law'

Egypt revives controversial desert capital project

Iran sentences fugitive ex-bank chief to jail

Iraq announces 'end of the war against Daesh'

Israeli air strike kills 2 in Gaza

UK foreign minister in Iran to push for Briton's release

Turkey's Erdogan seeks to lead Muslim response on Jerusalem

Iraqi Christians celebrate in town retaken from IS

Isolated US defiant at UN Security Council

Putin to visit Turkey for talks on Jerusalem, Syria

Protests sweep Muslim world over Jerusalem

US urges Saudi to show caution in regional disputes

Thousands march in Istanbul to protest US Jerusalem move

Bahrain Shiite leader undergoes surgery

Malaysians, Indonesians protest US move on Jerusalem

EU, Jordan voice backing for Palestinian state

Clashes in West Bank over US Jerusalem move

Macron appeals for calm over US Jerusalem embassy move

World leaders to 're-legitimise' Lebanon PM at Paris talks