First Published: 2006-10-11

 
The US-Iranian Scorecard
 

Diplomacy has been a one-sided game in the US-Iranian standoff, while tension keeps rising. The United States has rebuffed or ignored repeated attempts by two Iranian presidents to negotiate over the past five years. If this continues, we could all be losers, argues Omid Mohseni.

 

Middle East Online



The US record in dealing with Iran’s nuclear ambitions includes name-calling, demonization, funding of opposition groups, and support for Israel’s war against what it calls Iran’s proxy army, the Lebanese Hezbollah. Diplomatic negotiations? “Never,” says Bush. And the record of the past five years is discouraging.



Urged by Iran’s President Khatami, the United Nations named 2001 the “Year of Dialogue of Civilizations.” Since Iran was then enjoying good relations with everyone but Israel and the United States, Khatami’s diplomatic objective was clear. So was the cold shoulder his initiative got from the United States.



Four months after 9/11, President Bush named Iran, one of the few Muslim countries to commiserate with America’s pain, part of the “Axis of Evil.” Iran’s offer of help against al-Qaeda counted for nothing as the Bush administration demonized Khatami’s liberal regime as a supporter of terrorism and a potential nuclear danger to Americans.



An Iranian letter sent through the Swiss Embassy in May 2003 proposed ending the diplomatic standoff and restarting relations on the basis of mutual respect. Again, there was no American response, or even acknowledgement that the letter had been received.



Once the "weapons of mass destruction justification" for the ill-conceived invasion of Iraq collapsed, the Bush-Cheney team intimated that a diplomatic solution might be preferable in the case of Iran. But the administration then shunned negotiations between EU and Iranian diplomats while endlessly repeating its condemnation of the Iranian regime in speeches and interviews. A complete halt to the Iranian nuclear program was set forth as a precondition rather than an objective of negotiations. During Khatami’s presidency, the Iranian government had responded to UN concerns by making a positive diplomatic gesture, temporarily suspending its nuclear program. This had gained Iran nothing. Thus President Ahmadinejad, taking office in 2005, took further suspensions as a precondition for negotiations off the table.



In February 2006, the US Congress allocated $85 million for a propaganda campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran to help build a dissident network.



In April, Seymour Hersh wrote an article in the New Yorker about US plans for a military strike against Iran. Current and former American military and intelligence officials were quoted as saying that some planners even visualized using nuclear weapons.



In May, President Ahmadinejad wrote an 18-page letter to President Bush, clearly signaling his willingness for direct negotiations. The letter was completely ignored.



On July 12, the Israeli government started bombing Lebanon claiming it was just trying to retrieve two captured soldiers, yet earlier Hezbollah attacks of a similar kind had resulted not in war, but in negotiated prisoner exchanges. The US support for the Israeli bombing, and stalling in the UN to gain more time for Israel's ongoing assaults, sent a clear message that the war against Hezbollah was a proxy war against Iran.



Finally, at the end of September, when EU members were claiming progress in their negotiations with Iran, Congress passed the Iran Freedom Act. This renewal of the 1995 Iran-Libya Sanctions Act was described by Representative Dennis Kucinich, who voted against it, as designed to fund media propaganda and thereby lay the groundwork for war.



Given this record, Iran has come to understand that compliance with EU requests for suspending nuclear research will never defuse American hostility. In fact, suspending uranium enrichment as a precondition for negotiations would make Iran militarily vulnerable. It would entitle international inspectors to conduct an intrusive search throughout the country, a deliberate humiliation and clear violation of sovereignty. And via the inspectors it could provide a complete assessment of Iran’s missile defense system to American war planners. This is the pattern of events that occurred in Iraq prior to the current war.



Will Iran find itself in coming months in the same situation Iraq faced on March 19, 2003? Ahmadinejad’s administration knows that as long as the United States does not have definite intelligence on the extent of Iran’s nuclear program, dodging an American attack might be possible. What he does not know, after repeated attempts, is how to bring the US administration to the negotiating table. Perhaps no one except the American public can achieve this.

The outlook for negotiations is poor, but without negotiations, another war in the region seems inevitable.

Omid Mohseni is an Iranian-American scholar and writer who speaks on Iran-US relations.

 

Qatar says Gulf crisis hindering fight against IS

Khamenei vows to 'shred' nuclear deal if US pulls out

Baghdad says mission accomplished in Kurd operation

Bahrain accuses Iran of harbouring 160 'terrorists'

Jobless Tunisians seek new migration routes to Europe

Italy busts Libyan diesel smugglers

Fate of IS fighters in Raqa uncertain

Turkish Red Crescent concerned by Idlib humanitarian ‘drama’

US firm to build solar plants in Gaza

Ghost city Raqa scanned for survivors, bombs

Qatar emir calls for talks on visit to Indonesia

Iraq calls on BP to help develop Kirkuk oil

Israeli forces raid Palestinian media offices linked to Hamas

French parliament is set to pass new anti-terror law

Israel says no to Palestine talks until Hamas disarms

IS territory down to almost 10% of 2014 ‘caliphate’

Over 3000 civilians flee Raqa under deal with jihadists

Ideology and objectives clash at Deir Ezzor

Erdogan gets Polish backing on Turkey's EU bid

Iranian guards commander killed in Syria

Fitch Ratings says threat to Qatar liquidity fading

Iran warns EU against new nuclear deal conditions

Turkey activists face trial next week under terror charges

Netanyahu presses Russian defence minister on Iran

US-backed forces announce Raqa recapture

Hollande slams Trump's hardline stance on Iran nuclear deal

Iraq takes control of two key Kirkuk oil fields

US-backed forces retake Raqa state hospital

Divided Iraq tests limited US influence

New UN envoy in Rabat to restart talks on WSahara

Iraqi forces seize Kirkuk governor's office

Iraqi forces seize airport, oil field from Kurds

Saudi Arabia sets conditions to role in Syria reconstruction

In tougher approach, US offers multimillion-dollar reward for Hezbollah operatives

EU ministers join forces in support of Iran deal

Batteries, tape to thank for defeating jihadists in Raqa

Palestinian Authority top official visits Gaza

Israel strikes Syrian anti-aircraft battery in response to shots

Qatar starts to feel pinch from sanctions

Last days of Raqa battles ‘toughest fighting yet’

Omani role has helped Iran but may not do much in crisis with US

Head of IS in Southeast Asia dead

Mogadishu twin bomb death toll at 276

Gazans hope Palestinian reconciliation ends their woes

US-backed forces announce ‘final phase’ of Raqa recapture